IS Strategic Planning
[ Overview | Definition of Strategic Plan |
Importance]
[ Organizational Attributes that Influence Plan: | Phase of Technology Use | Strategic Impact ]
[ Planning Methods | Plan Outline ]
[ Tools: | Critical Success Factors |
Value Chain | Pareto Principle | Porfolio Risk ]
[ Example IS Strategy ]
What do people mean by strategic planning, in general?
There is a narrow sense and a broader sense of the terms
Narrow sense
Example: Information Engineering: A Strategic Planning Method
advocated by James Martin.
Goal
Derive a systems development plan &
Develop a large scale logical database for an entire system
(enterprise model)
Purpose is to get away from individual project approach and
integrate several projects.
- Reduce inconsistency and redundancy between projects
- Reduce cost
- Develop shared strategy
Basic method
- Identify Business Objectives and Environment
- Determine project ranking method
- Understand operations of business
- Detemine data requirements
- Identify system projects
- Evaluate system projects
- Organize development effort
Broader sense
(Includes narrow sense)
- Develop vision, mission and goals that are consistent with organization
goals. Should we be traditional data processing, major
improvements, radical change?
- Determine Role & Place of IS dept.
Development role or supportive role (Information center)?
Organize dept. by project, IS function, organizational function?
- Degree of technology centralization.
- Plan development environment (e.g., languages, CASE tools)
- Determine Project characteristics.
- Create project teams, project goals, commit resources, schedule,
software quality assurance standards, documentation standards.
An explicit or implicit plan that supports the development,
implementation and use of IS in an organization for the next 3 to
5 years.
Reasons for strategic planning
(from Tapscott, Henderson and Greenberg, 1985).
- The Scope of Integrated Systems Have social,
environmental and technological component. They affect
the nature of the organization. Effects must be
anticipated so changes can be made to the various
components to achieve "maximum" organizational
performance.
- The Costs of the Technology. Costs are high.
- Protecting the Corporate Investment. Technology is
constantly changing. Various groups need the technology.
A plan is required whereby purchases will position the
organization to evolve towards integrated systems.
- The Complexity of the Technology. Plan so various
pieces of technology can come together (integrate) to
obtain the greatest organizational impact.
- The Issue of Responsibility. Helps indicates what
departments are responsible for what aspects of the
evolving system.
- The Problem of Differing Perspectives. Planning
process is important. Requires various people to come
together and create a common vision. Helps resolve
disputes.
- The Issue of Managing Change. Help create an
environment where new systems will be accepted by the
user. Plan training programs and methods of system
implementation.
- The Growing Demands of Technology. Everyone wants
some of the latest technology. Without planning everyone
goes in a different direction. Planning also helps
manage user expectations.
- Opportunity Management. IS planning can influence
business objectives. Provide a strategic advantage.
Reasons for not developing an IS strategic plan
- Planning is exclusionary and undemocratic. In the
past, end-users, line management and non-technical senior
managers have not participated in the process.
- Planning is often used by data processing managers to
bring the use of all technology under their control.
- Planning represents the view that systems should be
imposed from above by a central systems authority.
- Planning is unrealistic. Technology is too complex
to plan the details. It is also changing too fast to
predict how it should be used in the future.
- Planning costs money and frequently is unsuccessful.
- Corporate wide integrated systems cost money and may
retard "local" implementation and productivity
improvements.
Desirable characteristics
(from Earl, 1993).
- Should have some method. Not totally ad hoc.
Methods should incorporate business goals.
- Process should involve many types of people. The
process requires top management support, line management
participation, user participation, IS group
participation.
- Implementation. The plan should lead to some
implementable systems.
Planning Processes
- Business-led approach
- Current business plans lead
the way. IS plans can be built from current business
plans. Business plans are analyzed to determine where
information systems are most required.
- Method-driven approach
- Must use a formal technique
or method. Frequently performed by consultants.
- Administrative approaches
- Emphasize resource
planning. Provide a budget and a policy to exam
projects. Proposals for projects go through a
hierarchical approval process.
- Technological approach
- Based on an information
systems oriented model of the business (ER model, DFD).
Very demanding. Focuses on information integration.
- Organizational approach
- The strategic IS plan is
not a neat, separate endeavor. The applications etc. are
identified in a more subtle fashion. Every type of
planning meeting from corporate strategic planning to
lower level planning is aware of the possible importance
and implications of IS. Special studies can be done to
facilitate integration and the derivation of an IS theme.
Evaluation of the Methods
| Business | Method | Admin | Tech | Organ. |
| Method | L | H | L | H | M |
| Process | L | L | M | L | H |
| Implementation | M | L | H | M | H |
(from Tapscott, Henderson,
and Greenberg, 1985).
- Strategic Framework. Current and Future Context.
- Environmental Scan. External trends, critical
issues.
- Business/Organization Assessment. Comparative
analysis. Review organizations major strengths and
weaknesses, obstacles. Review industry, competition and
organization.
- Technology Forecast
- Strategic Direction
- Provide basic indication of organization-wide
opportunities for using new technology to improve
productivity and achieve the business objectives. Do an
"Opportunity analysis". Raise awareness in organization
of technology opportunities. May interview managers etc.
Areas to look at include: Organizational communication
approaches, information resource management approaches,
decision support, function needs, quality or work life.
- Global Cost-Benefit: A Forecast.
- Set IS Objectives for next three to five years.
Ask some of these questions: "If we stay the way
we are, where are we going?" "If we change, where
are we going?" "Why are we going there?" "How
will we get there?" "What is the cost of getting
there?" "What is the benefit of getting there?"
"Which parts of the organization need to get there
first?"
- State Strategic Assumptions
- Objectives may be willing to "pilot" some projects.
- The Functional Description and Tool Diffusion Plan. This
is part of the strategy for developing a coherent technical
infrastructure for the organization.
- A functional description indicates the major IS needs
of various parts of the organization and perhaps
allocates responsibility for their support (e.g.,
corporate or departmental). This could include access to
databases, decision support, meeting scheduling,
communication, text processing, departmental
applications. Out of this might come some standards that
serve to integrate the IS through out the organization.
- Tool diffusion plan. Indicate the allocation of
tools to meet function and the order of implementation.
Does not indicate exact hardware or software choices.
- Global Technology Architecture. Indicates some of the
hardware and software choices at least generically that will
be used to integrate the organization. Considers type of
computer (mainframe, mini, pc), degree of
centralization/decentralization, type of database, LAN.
- Information Architecture. Describes in more detail how
information will be distributed throughout the organization.
Also indicates what information is needed. What information
will be managed at what level. May do ER models, information
engineering. Try to reduce data redundancy.
- Communications Architecture for Open Systems. Develop a
strategy that now and in the future allows the pieces of the
IS architecture to communicate with each other and the outside
world. Decide on communication protocols. Need to worry
about across vendor communication (getting better). Also
decide on network topology.
- Technology Policy. Could provide information, informal
technology recommendations, formal guidelines, or formal
policies that must be obeyed. Could provide, technical
standards (hardware, operating systems, generic office
systems, end user applications), security, documentation, back
up, vendor selection, methods for cost/benefit analysis,
development methods.
- Implications for human resource management. Consider
social factors of technical plan. Does organization need to
be redesigned? Will informal methods of communication be
changed? Will there be political problems in implementing
plan (changing power relations)? Possible job design
implications? Training?
- A Strategy for the Work Environment. Environment of
worker. (e.g., location of computer room, electrical outlet
locations, ability to cable the offices, noise problems,
ergonomic standards, chairs, desks). Environmental
implications at corporate (e.g., interior design),
departmental and individual level (e.g., desk design).
- A Strategy for Leading Change. How to do we move to
future system (i.e., a transitioning strategy). Choose
appropriate time, motivate, create learning environment.
Def: "The limited number of areas in which results, if
they are satisfactory, will ensure successful competitive
performance for the organization."(Rockart, 1979).
Support obtainment of organizational goals.
Examples
Automotive Industry: Styling, Quality dealer
system, cost control, meeting energy standards lead to
goals such as market share, new product success, earnings
per share.
Supermarket Industry: Product mix, inventory, sales
promotion, price.
Governmental hospital: Integrate health care with
other hospitals, efficient use of scare resources,
improved cost accounting.
Sources of CSFs
Industry, competitive strategy,
environmental factors, temporal factors (period of time).
Procedure
Identify goals, identify CSF, identify
measures (i.e., information), identify data required to
measure, identify ways to meet the plan.
Example measures: Image in financial markets--
price/earnings ration, company morale--turnover and
informal feedback.
Organizations consist of a collection of value activities
that design, produce, market, deliver and support a
product or service.
Organizations consist of primary and support activities.
Want to add activities that increase value (i.e.,
increase in amount customers will pay - cost of
activity).
--------------------------------------------------------------\\\
Firm Infrastructure
Support Human Resource Management
Value Technology Development M
Activities Procurement A
-------------------------------------------------------------- R
Inbound Operations Outbound Sales & Service G
Logistics Logistics Marketing I
N
-------------------->Primary Activities---------------------->///
Method
For each cell identify the specific activities that add
value. If possible quantify the value. For each
activity, identify the cost as a percentage of the total
cost for the value chain. Figure out common causes to
the costs, if possible. Can also determine a percentage
of assets for each activity. Try to figure out IS
requirements that have largest impact based on these
figures. (Also compare with competitors maps).
Based on the idea that 20% of something accounts for 80%
of thing measured. Distinguish between vital few and the
trivial many.
Procedure
- Determine the objective that needs to be
attacked (e.g., market share, profit, revenue,
quality, time).
- Determine measures of this objective
- Determine items that influence this objective
and their corresponding measures.
- Rank the items in descending order based on
their contribution to the measure.
- Identify ways to influence the activities that
account for roughly 80% of the measure.
Can apply the method recursively. Possibly can even
start from goals.
Desire an appropriate risk. If you are running a factory
type IS, desire low risk projects. If in a turnaround or
strategic situation, need some risk.
Dimensions influencing risk
- Project size
- Experience with the Technology
- Project Structure (easy or complex)
Factors that influence portfolio risk
- Stability of IS group
- Perceived quality of IS group by insiders
- IS critical to delivery of current corporate
services.
- IS important decision support aid
- Experienced IS development group
- Major IS problems in last two years.
- New IS management team.
- IS perceived as critical to future services.
- IS perceived as critical to future decision
support aids.
- Company perceived as backward in use of IS.
Several universities and governments have placed their strategic plans on the www. Some of these plans can be found at IT Plans.
Last modified: October 9, 1997
Dirk Baldwin, MIS, UW-Parkside,
baldwin@uwp.edu